Cannon Kingsley vs Paul Jubb Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Kingsley vs P. Jubb

Cannon Kingsley
USA
l
w
w
w
l
w
w
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
24
Age
26
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
5'11" (180 cm)
571
C. Rank
383
404
Best Rank
180
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$201.0K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Paul Jubb
GBR
w
l
w
w
w
w
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
24
Age
26
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
5'11" (180 cm)
571
C. Rank
383
404
Best Rank
180
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$201.0K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Kingsley 1 - 0 Jubb
They have played 2 sets in total, with Cannon Kingsley winning 2 and Paul Jubb winning 0. The last match between Cannon Kingsley and Paul Jubb was at the Columbus 2 Challenger, 21-09-2022, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Cannon Kingsley getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kingsley | 1 |
| Jubb | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Columbus 2 Challenger(09-21-22)
Cannon Kingsley
7
6
Paul Jubb
6
4
C. Kingsley vs P. Jubb H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $200,960 |
| 57.77% (145-106) | Career Total W/L | 67.21% (246-120) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 13 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Kingsley vs P. Jubb Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cannon Kingsley has won 47.23% of points on their second serve, while Paul Jubb has won 44.50%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cannon Kingsley, in recent form, has won 43.56% of their opponent's second serve points, while Paul Jubb has won 47.00%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.95% and 28.18% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cannon Kingsley has saved 50.53% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paul Jubb has saved 55.93% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cannon Kingsley has won 52.94% of matches played (W/L 27/24), with Paul Jubb winning 58.33% (W/L 28/20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cannon Kingsley has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 34/21), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 61/51). Paul Jubb has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 57/22), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 54% (W/L 22/19).
- Player level: In the last year, Cannon Kingsley has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.57% of matches (W/L 15/13), where as Paul Jubb has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 84.00% of matches (W/L 21/4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cannon Kingsley winning 1 times and Paul Jubb being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Cannon Kingsley winning 2 and Paul Jubb winning 0.
- The last match between Cannon Kingsley and Paul Jubb was at the Columbus 2 Challenger, 21-09-2022, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Cannon Kingsley getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:7:44.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cannon Kingsley has played against opponents with an average rank of 417.57 while Paul Jubb has played against players with an average rank of 384.15.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cannon Kingsley has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paul Jubb has won 69% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cannon Kingsley has converted 24.79% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paul Jubb has converted 36.61% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Cannon Kingsley vs Paul Jubb Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Kingsley vs P. Jubb H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 11 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 11 |
| 2:7:44 | Average Match Time | 2:7:44 |
| 55% (41/74) | 1st Serve % | 53% (58/110) |
| 78% (32/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (41/58) |
| 52% (17/33) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (19/52) |
| 36% (4/11) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (3/6) |
| 45% (50/110) | Return Points Win % | 34% (25/74) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Kingsley 50%, Jubb 51%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Kingsley 49%, Jubb 51%.
Break Points Saved %: Kingsley 56%, Jubb 59%.
C. Kingsley Recent Matches Played
P. Jubb Recent Matches Played

C. Kingsley vs P. Jubb Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.77% (145/106) | YTD Win/Loss | 67.21% (246/120) |
| 56.42% (325/251) | Sets Win/Loss | 63.93% (546/308) |
| 53.64% (2939/2540) | Games Win/Loss | 55.04% (4497/3674) |
| 54.46% (61/51) | Hard Win/Loss | 71.20% (136/55) |
| 61.82% (34/21) | Clay Win/Loss | 72.15% (57/22) |
| 59.52% (50/34) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56.36% (31/24) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 53.66% (22/19) |
| 0.54 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 1443 | Aces Total | 1157 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 456 | Total Double Faults | 1097 |
| 1:32:23 | Average Match Time | 1:37:22 |
| 427.35 | Average Opponent Rank | 407.1 |
| 62% (9688/15602) | 1st Serve % | 62% (14950/24035) |
| 72% (6964/9688) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (10406/14950) |
| 52% (3065/5913) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (4758/9085) |
| 41% (604/1483) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1103/2648) |
| 39% (6089/15664) | Return Points Win % | 41% (10314/24969) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 35.71% (5/9) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 62.50% (10/6) |
| 49.49% (49/50) | Challenger W/L | 52.80% (66/59) |
| 64.43% (96/53) | Futures W/L | 78.20% (165/46) |
| 58% (143/248) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 68% (243/357) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 44% (32/72) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (72/121) |
| 52% (40/77) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (67/119) |
| 87% (142/124) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (240/215) |
| 13% (142/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (240/24) |
| 19% (109/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (126/31) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
05:05 PM 14/11/25
PredictionW1
3.62
W2
1.24
08:00 PM 14/11/25
PredictionW1
1.666
W2
2.05
07:30 PM 14/11/25
PredictionW1
3.38
W2
1.27
08:00 PM 14/11/25
PredictionW1
1.42
W2
2.61
09:30 PM 14/11/25
PredictionW1
2.83
W2
1.37
02:30 AM 15/11/25
PredictionW1
1.186
W2
4.1
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Jannik Sinner vs Ben Shelton Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Montevideo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Roman Andres Burruchaga vs Mariano Navone Betting Tips & Picks November 14, 2025
14 Nov 2025
Jannik Sinner vs Ben Shelton Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Jannik Sinner vs Ben Shelton Betting Tips & Picks November 14, 2025
Top Predictions Today
16:05
H2H 12-0
22:30
H2H 6-3
H2H 2-1
H2H 1-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Orlando
United States
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal